S1 Rebuild(s)

[Dave Adams]

some pics of the rebuild process,

the top trailing arm bracket is broke......

the diff is sloping back a little (looking up) so that will need sorting.......

As you can see there isn't a lot of bracing in an S1 chassis, that will be sorted.

[Dave Adams]

The diff angle........basically the input angle should mirror the output angle. also the overall angle should be as small as possible.
it reduces wear and vibration and helps reduce transmission losses.

[Big Vern]

You must have some angle on the UJ's or they'll wear out in no time.

GKN say they stake joints can run upto 12deg @ 10000rev/min (you can run larger angles but you have to slow them down)

Example - If the diff flange is sqaure and the engine/gearbox is 6deg nose up then the prop angle wants to be 3deg

[Dave Adams]

Yeah i knew there should be some angle perhaps i should have said the same or similar small angle. there is always some angle caused by the axle movement.

[Dave Adams]

The trouble with my axle and the diff looking up is that amy movement of the axle makes it worse by increasing the angle beyond what is good.

[Dave Adams]

Which is why it was corrected out when i rebuilt it last year.

[James Doulton]

I knew that UJ's can cause vibration when they are at an angle and that the scale of the problem gets much bigger as the UJ angle increases.

I hadn't heard about UJ's needing to have at least a small angle though. Do you understand the mechanism by which they wear out if the angle is too small because it seems a surprising result to me? I'm not disputing it, I just want to understand it.

[Dave Adams]

I think its because a slight angle causes the bearings to rotate and thus even out the wear/ loads how ever its unlikely to be an issue on a prop for a car (unless you suspension is very hard)

[1midz0wwbl268]

didn't  the transit van use MT75? box?  if so van breakers might be your best bet , 

[Big Vern]

T9 and MT75 only similar inso far as they have 5 forward gears and were originally fitted to Fords :-)

Zetec will fit on 2000e with the right bellhousing but a 2.0l Zetec will be close to the torque limit, probably better to flog the 2000e box and get a T9. 

[Dave Adams]

Good job mines the 1800 ;-)

[Dave Adams]

I would gladly come to an arrangement over the ( lancia/fiat ) box. i could even chuck in the engine for you to rob the tuning parts off it. i. e. The high comp new pistons, and the big valve head (43mm inlets) and piper cams.

[Dave Adams]

well scrap yard hunting got me some bits for my car....the lancia engined project. not the green one which incidentally is getting sold as soon as i can be bothered to advertise it.

so i have a Ford escort radiator (one of the last ones...it had a "zetec" 1.6 engine in it) with its enormous fan, a VW polo expansion tank  both cost a total of £25 so not to bad  as they look to be in really good nick.

i still need a gearbox, and if anyone (Steve if your interested let me know) wants the lancia 5 speed box and tuning parts talk to me a PX for a gear box is well on the cards.....